A few final comments about the convention, and some answers to your questions.
1. My sister-in-law took the photos at the awards ceremony, and asks for forgiveness. She says it’s a miracle the photos don’t show her thumb in the foreground. Her husband is a former combat photographer who can take crisp, in-focus photos while being shot at. She apologizes that he wasn’t at the ceremony.
2. Yes, the people at the convention were overwhelmingly women. The men claimed they didn’t mind being outnumbered. However, here’s a photo from Saturday’s book fair. The two men in the shot are both thriller writers — Barry Eisler, standing with his back to the camera in the blue shirt, and J.A. Konrath, seated near him, with the beard and ponytail. Note that they’re huddling together for solidarity.
3. Here’s another gent who braved Planet RT: Rich Klinzman, a regular contributor to the blog, who drove to Orlando to get some books signed and to pick up his advance copy of The Memory Collector, which he won as a runner-up in my contest last year.
4. In the comments to my post about winning the RT Reviewers Choice Award, Snart says:
A Romance Writing Award. Whodda thought? Cousin Tater would be so proud of you!
No, Snart — Cousin Tater would set up a booth at the convention to sell vampire-themed lingerie. She would then abandon it to accost the Mr. Romance contestants. At which point the convention would be canceled, because none of the contestants would have survived.
5. Also in the comments, Monita writes:
Ferd and Mr. Peebles are sure this is a sign that Romance with Jo must be coming in Memory Collector!
Ferd and Mr. Peebles have all kinds of dreams, Monita. You’ll have to read the new novel to find out how Jo reacts.
6. Sharon K writes:
So pleased for you, Meg (even if I’m not exactly sure what a “Procedural” novel is….?).
In crime writing, “procedural” is short for “police procedural” and traditionally focuses on the official law enforcement investigation of a crime. Procedurals generally feature cops as protagonists, and are often set in a precinct house or, more recently, a forensics lab. Think of the novels of Ed McBain and Jeffery Deaver, and the CSI shows. Jo Beckett isn’t a cop, but she consults for law enforcement, so that’s where Romantic Times found space for her in their awards.
And excellent punctuation, Sharon.
7. Sharon also gets the last word, because her comment on “romantic” fiction is spot on:
But as we all know — romance is really just shorthand for the great, big emotions in life which slam you in the heart, and you’re clearly managing to hit the spot in a crime novel!
Thanks.





Started reading yet, Rich?
Great pictures. Rich, let us know how the new book is. (First and foremost, I need to know if the dog is okay?!
)
Thanks for sharing those Meg.
Looking at my photo I think I can read Meg’s mind. Clearly she is thinking, “It’s really a shame the Pillsbury Doughboy let himself go so completely”.
I have just returned from my own trip. My advance copy gives me a great excuse to put aside one of the dullest books I have ever been roped into reading. I hope to start The Memory Collector in the morning. As I explained to Meg, dealing with the mild case of OCD I have been blessed with, I didn’t know if I should wait for the hardcover or not. I also wondered if maybe the ending might be different than the final release. (I have a twisted sense of humor that way.)
All in all I had a wonderful time. For all of you who may not have met the marvelous Ms. Gardiner, you are in for a very nice treat.
Zowie!! Congratulations big time, Meg!!
(Sorry to be late chiming in. I just got back from my own mystery weekend conference, and am thrilled for you.)
(Not sorry about the !!!s. You deserve them.)
Ferd and Mr. Peebles say, “So you’re saying we’ve got a shot with Jo!”
Hope springs eternal…
I think my comment got lost in cyber space, so I’ll send it again….
Big Congratulations to you Meg!! I’m so pleased for you.
I have just finished the first chapet, DJ. I assume you were asking about the dog named Whiskey? Don’t know yet but I probably won’t give it away. It IS a thriller you know and I hate “spoilers” when it’s done to me and I doubt anyone here would be any different. ;>)
By the way, I have not spotted a single typo.
Rich, Rich, Rich…the dog is dead, isn’t he? I knew it. He’s hurt and he’s dying and he’s DEAD, isn’t he? They killed him dead, dead, dead I just know it.
What’s that Lassie? Whiskey is dead in the well?
Shucks Rich. See what happens when you leave it to my imagination? Oookay. I’ll wait and read the book. But, he’s painfully dead isn’t he?
No. Don’t tell me.
You know, I knew the answer five minutes ago but…..wait a minute. Where was I?
Meg, I do apologise for not congratulating you on your richly deserved award. I’ve had a nasty abscess in my mouth since Saturday and have been feeling very sorry for myself and not at all in the mood for blogging.
Well done!
Don’t toy with me Rich, hell hath no fury like an animal lover with a DEAD DOG IN THE WELL! Which happened on page…hmmm…let me think…what page was that again Rich?
Dana Jean,
I hate to sound like a snob but this will remain (until June 11th) one of my own Dirty Secrets. How’s that for a reference?
I’m just teasin’ ya Rich. I wouldn’t want to know a spoiler anyway. June 11th it is.
I gotta go Rich. I’m right in the middle of something…
We are gathered here today to mourn the passing of Whiskey, faithful and loving dog and yea though he walks through the valley of the shadow of dead, dead dogs, he will fear no evil….