Part I: I can’t dog-ear the pages on my iBook. Sue!
Apple Sued Because iPad Does Not Work “Just Like A Book.”
A new class action suit filed in California takes issue with how the iPad shuts off automatically if it overheats. In particular, however, the suit claims that the marketing phrase “reading on the iPad is just like reading a book” is misleading, and that Apple is therefore engaging in fraud and misleading consumers.
Says the Husband: Yeah, because when you lick your finger and swipe it across the screen, nothing sticks. And the pages don’t flip in the wind, either.
Part II: Prepare to be deported, all you frenchy lawyers. And physicists.
Iowa GOP wants to “restore” 13th Amendment, strip lawyers, and president, of citizenship.
This isn’t about slavery, which the 13th Amendment bans. It’s about an earlier proposed amendment to the constitution, introduced in 1812 but never ratified.
Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution reads:
“No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”
[The] proposed amendment extended the ban from office-holders to “any citizen of the United States” and made the penalty loss of citizenship.
“To quote the Web site Constitutional Concepts, ‘This Amendment was for the specific purpose of banning participation in government operations by attorneys and bankers who claimed the Title of Nobility of ‘Esquire.’”
Which would mean… me. Gee, thanks. I mean, I think the lawyers suing Apple because the iPad isn’t literally a paperback are stupid and greedy, but I wouldn’t go so far as stripping them of citizenship. And if the amendment is ever enacted into law, will the Iowa GOP provide me with a one-way ticket to the Bahamas, or will they just stand on the beach prodding me into the ocean with a broomstick?
But wait, could this be a misinterpretation of the word, “title”? An example of unintended consequences?
Naturally, most lawyers see it differently. “The esquire thing is ridiculous,” says R. B. Bernstein, a professor at New York Law School and author of Amending America. “‘Esquire’ is not a title of nobility.
And lawyers aren’t actually the main target of the plank.
There are, of course, other implications of Thirteenthism, such as ensuring that the United States never again suffers the humiliation of having a president win the Nobel Peace Prize. That was just what the Iowa Republicans had in mind, according to Plogmann, who wrote in an e-mail that the plank “was meant to make a statement about the delegates’ opinion about Mr. Obama receiving the prize.”
(Presumably they didn’t mind if, in the process, they were also making a statement about any American scientist or writer unlucky enough to win a Nobel.)
Yeah, take that, Walter Kohn, and Toni Morrison, and Vernon Smith, and Linda Buck. Start swimming.
Oh, wait –
[T]he Department of Justice looked into whether Obama needed Congressional approval to accept the Nobel under the existing emoluments clause, and based on the meaning of “foreign state” (which would not cover the Nobel Prize Committee) concluded that he did not.
Maybe I’ll unpack my bikini. And wait for more examples of stupidity. They should be along soon.
























